This is just a short one that someone pointed out to me over the weekend. For spacecraft that have to do their own rendezvous and docking with say a space station or depot, you need an RCS capable of not just holding a stable attitude, but also providing translational control in all three axes. Ie you need to be able to push yourself in x, y, or z directions, and rotate around each of those axes. If you have a tug to do the prox-ops however, the actual spacecraft/launcher itself only needs RCS capable of holding a stable attitude (ie provide moments about the x,y, and z axes)…
Does this actually save you any complexity in the RCS system or avionics? I think this may allow you to reduce the number of RCS thrusters, but I’m not sure (and don’t really have time to think it through today).
Latest posts by Jonathan Goff (see all)
- SBIR Proposaling Advice - March 8, 2019
- FISO Telecon Lecture on LEO Propellant Depots for Interplanetary Smallsat Launch - November 28, 2018
- AAS Paper Review: RAAN Agnostic 3-Burn Departure Methodology for Deep Space Missions from LEO Depots (Part 2 of 2) - September 17, 2018