<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reason to Get an NSF L2 Subscription #2921: ESAS Appendices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/</link>
	<description>Random Musings from the Warped Minds of Jonathan Goff, Ken Murphy, John Hare, and Kirk Sorensen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 20:53:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selenian Boondocks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Thoughts on ESAS Appendix Flaws</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator>Selenian Boondocks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Thoughts on ESAS Appendix Flaws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4716</guid>
		<description>[...] few weeks ago, when I first discussed the ESAS Appendices on this blog, I had to be somewhat vague about my concerns, since the information wasn&#8217;t out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks ago, when I first discussed the ESAS Appendices on this blog, I had to be somewhat vague about my concerns, since the information wasn&#8217;t out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4673</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4673</guid>
		<description>Interesting document. It looks like 8m Core w/3 RD171 + 2x Zenit is the best heavy lift boosters out of all options.

Who&#039;d have thunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting document. It looks like 8m Core w/3 RD171 + 2x Zenit is the best heavy lift boosters out of all options.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;d have thunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fl_rocket_guy</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4672</link>
		<dc:creator>fl_rocket_guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 03:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4672</guid>
		<description>http://wikileaks.org/wiki/To_the_moon_and_beyond:_NASA%27s_Exploration_Systems_Architecture_Study%2C_630_pages%2C_2006</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/To_the_moon_and_beyond:_NASA%27s_Exploration_Systems_Architecture_Study%2C_630_pages%2C_2006" rel="nofollow">http://wikileaks.org/wiki/To_the_moon_and_beyond:_NASA%27s_Exploration_Systems_Architecture_Study%2C_630_pages%2C_2006</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Goff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>Just as a clarification to comment #12, I don&#039;t know who gave the appendices to Chris, and was only speculating on why.  That&#039;s the typical explanation given, but I should be clear that that wasn&#039;t meant as an authoritative statement.

~Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as a clarification to comment #12, I don&#8217;t know who gave the appendices to Chris, and was only speculating on why.  That&#8217;s the typical explanation given, but I should be clear that that wasn&#8217;t meant as an authoritative statement.</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4667</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4667</guid>
		<description>Griffin wanted the study suppressed so, it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griffin wanted the study suppressed so, it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Goff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4666</guid>
		<description>I actually agree with you guys that it&#039;s a travesty that a) this is only coming to light now, and b) the only way that someone at NASA was willing to release this information was to a subscription site where they could keep it out of the reach of the general public.  But, now that it&#039;s out, it should be a lot easier to do a FOIA request.  Just make sure you don&#039;t ask for Appendix 12--that&#039;s the one that has the Sensitive But Unclassified information in it that they were using as an excuse to bury the whole set of appendices.  I&#039;ll let you guys know if there are other gems that people discover.  

We&#039;ll get this fully public.

~Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually agree with you guys that it&#8217;s a travesty that a) this is only coming to light now, and b) the only way that someone at NASA was willing to release this information was to a subscription site where they could keep it out of the reach of the general public.  But, now that it&#8217;s out, it should be a lot easier to do a FOIA request.  Just make sure you don&#8217;t ask for Appendix 12&#8211;that&#8217;s the one that has the Sensitive But Unclassified information in it that they were using as an excuse to bury the whole set of appendices.  I&#8217;ll let you guys know if there are other gems that people discover.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll get this fully public.</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4664</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Greenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4664</guid>
		<description>If NASA had nothing to hide, we would have seen the appendices already.  Ergo, I don&#039;t need to take Jon G.&#039;s word, or the L2 sections word, that there&#039;s something wrong with the assumptions in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If NASA had nothing to hide, we would have seen the appendices already.  Ergo, I don&#8217;t need to take Jon G.&#8217;s word, or the L2 sections word, that there&#8217;s something wrong with the assumptions in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill White</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>NASA can solve this straight away by posting the documents themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA can solve this straight away by posting the documents themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil Trotter</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4662</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil Trotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4662</guid>
		<description>I agree with Wingo, it really chaps my a$$ that I am required to subscribe to a website to view documents, videos etc. that were created with my tax money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Wingo, it really chaps my a$$ that I am required to subscribe to a website to view documents, videos etc. that were created with my tax money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESAS Appendices Made Public &#124; MarsBlog.net</title>
		<link>http://selenianboondocks.com/2009/05/reason-to-get-an-nsf-l2-subscription-2921-esas-appendices/comment-page-1/#comment-4660</link>
		<dc:creator>ESAS Appendices Made Public &#124; MarsBlog.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 03:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenianboondocks.com/?p=982#comment-4660</guid>
		<description>[...] Goff has a few interesting details from his first look at the appendices: Now, having seen some of what’s in them (I’ve mostly been focusing on the 300+ page appendix [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goff has a few interesting details from his first look at the appendices: Now, having seen some of what’s in them (I’ve mostly been focusing on the 300+ page appendix [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

